Title
U.S. Agricultural Industry and Immigration
Author

Brian Coward
American River College, Geography 350: Data Acquisition in GIS; Fall 2011
Contact Information (1110 West Capitol Ave, West Sacramento, CA, 95691, (916)617-4673, email: brianc@cityofwestsacramento.org)
Abstract

Undocumented workers currently make up a large percentage of the US labor force, especially in the agriculture industry. Current immigration policy does not meet the demand for agriculture workers not met by US citizens and legal residents. This paper will explore the relationship between undocumented and documented, foreign-born agricultural workers and will illuminate the gaps, if any between supply and demand in the agriculture workforce and serve as a starting point for discussion about meaningful and practical immigration reform in the United States.
Introduction

With recent debate over immigration reform and budgetary issues affecting government and industry alike, we must be fully aware of the actions necessary to achieve immigration reform. There are several industries that are directly impacted by the immigration policies set forth by our government, and perhaps the largest industry affected is agriculture. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services provides a temporary worker classification, H-2A, to foreign-born agricultural workers to meet the harvesting needs that aren't met by US Citizens. The H-2A program provides a legal channel for farm owners to apply for temporary work permits for foreign-born workers through the H-2A program. Undocumented workers make up a large proportion of the U.S. agriculture industry’s labor force. By design, the H-2A program is intended to meet the labor demands of the agriculture industry, but falls short as evidenced by the large number of undocumented workers in the U.S. agriculture labor force. In this analysis I hope to illustrate the discrepancy between the number of foreign-born workers permitted under the H-2A program, and undocumented agriculture workers working in the industry.
Background

Current estimates by the US Department of Labor put our 2007 number of crop workers at 1.4 million, and suggest that 2/3 are undocumented. Using data from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, the Department of Labor, and data from the National Agriculture Workers Survey (NAWS), I will illustrate how the current H-2A program falls short of providing sufficient workers to meet demand for temporary workers in the agriculture industry for the years 2006-2009.

(Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006-2009)
(Foreign Labor Certification Data Center, 2006-2009)
(The National Agriculture Workers Survey, 1989-2009)

The UC Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics provided an excellent analysis of the California Agriculture Industry in ‘Labor Trajectories in California’s Produce Industry’.(Martin and Calvin, 2011)

Figures and methodologies for statistical immigration information in the United States, were obtained from the Urban Institute. (Passel, Capps, and Fix, 2004)

Estimates of Unauthorized Immigrants can be found in ‘A Portrait of Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States’ by the PEW Hispanic Center. (Passel & Cohn, 2009)

For a clear understanding of the H-2A immigration program, and the challenges of being a foreign-born agricultural worker, ‘Ending the Silence: Thai H-2A Workers, Recruitment Fees, and the Fair Labor Standards Act’ was an excellent source. (Schmitt, 2007)

A brief history of the California agriculture industry was provided by the ‘California Hired Farm Labor 1960-2010’. (Martin, 2011)

Methods

The National Agriculture Workers Survey (NAWS) conducts an annual survey of farm employees across the United States. This survey is done on a Regional rather then State basis, and allows employees to safely disclose their citizenship status. This survey allows for the calculation of a ratio of ‘UNAUTHORIZED’ to ‘CITIZEN’, ‘GREEN CARD’, ‘OTHER WORK AUTHORIZED’ workers to be obtained on a Regional level. For the purposes of this analysis, that ratio was applied to each State within it’s Region to determine the estimated number of undocumented agricultural workers. This percentage of undocumented workers was then applied to Department of Labor estimates of the total number of workers in the agricultural industry, by State, to determine the number of undocumented workers in each State. The Department of Labor publishes annual reports that estimate U.S. work force by classification. Each classification was evaluated to determine whether or not it was agricultural in nature. The total number of agricultural workers per state was obtained from this data. The following are agricultural classifications used to estimate a by state agriculture labor force: "Agricultural workers, all other", "Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations", "Farmworkers and laborers, crop, nursery, and greenhouse", "Farmworkers, farm and ranch animals", “Agricultural equipment operators”, “Animal breeders”, “Animal trainers”, “Farm equipment mechanics”, “Fishers and related fishing workers” The H-2A program provides data on the number of documented guest workers allowed into each State annually. Using that data, estimated numbers of undocumented agricultural workers (by State) were calculated, and compared to number of H-2A workers admitted, as illustrated in the maps and data sets below. Results are organized by State, and by year.
Results
Undocumented : Documented Guest Agricultural Labor
U.S. Agriculture Data

2006

State

State Abreviation

Region

% of Undocumented Workers by Region

Documented Guest Workers (H-2A)

Total Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented : H-2A Ratio

Alabama

AL

2

27.2%

355

9,620

2,612

7.4

Arkansas

AR

2

27.2%

3,220

9,810

2,664

0.8

Arizona

AZ

4

16.6%

1,086

26,050

4,312

4.0

California

CA

6

33.0%

3,632

346,680

114,369

31.5

Colorado

CO

5

28.0%

859

5,860

1,641

1.9

Connecticut

CT

1

19.3%

475

1,890

364

0.8

Delaware

DE

1

19.3%

65

1,390

268

4.1

Florida

FL

2

27.2%

3,579

63,760

17,312

4.8

Georgia

GA

2

27.2%

5,315

20,290

5,509

1.0

Iowa

IA

3

9.9%

325

9,090

901

2.8

Idaho

ID

5

28.0%

2,314

9,310

2,608

1.1

Illinois

IL

3

9.9%

318

9,770

968

3.0

Indiana

IN

3

9.9%

21

5,420

537

25.6

Kansas

KS

3

9.9%

731

4,610

457

0.6

Kentucky

KY

1

19.3%

3,655

7,940

1,529

0.4

Louisiana

LA

2

27.2%

3,211

7,240

1,966

0.6

Massachusetts

MA

1

19.3%

631

4,040

778

1.2

Maryland

MD

1

19.3%

663

4,590

884

1.3

Maine

ME

1

19.3%

529

3,350

645

1.2

Michigan

MI

3

9.9%

319

9,030

895

2.8

Minnesota

MN

3

9.9%

368

8,420

834

2.3

Missouri

MO

3

9.9%

106

9,240

916

8.6

Mississippi

MS

2

27.2%

1,805

7,520

2,042

1.1

Montana

MT

5

28.0%

687

4,160

1,165

1.7

North Carolina

NC

1

19.3%

14,206

12,690

2,443

0.2

North Dakota

ND

3

9.9%

497

2,350

233

0.5

Nebraska

NE

3

9.9%

101

6,590

653

6.5

New Hampshire

NH

1

19.3%

251

1,370

264

1.1

New Jersey

NJ

1

19.3%

321

7,590

1,461

4.6

New Mexico

NM

4

16.6%

107

8,070

1,336

12.5

Nevada

NV

5

28.0%

1,248

1,110

311

0.2

New York

NY

1

19.3%

3,134

12,080

2,326

0.7

Ohio

OH

3

9.9%

1,087

10,110

1,002

0.9

Oklahoma

OK

4

16.6%

196

6,660

1,102

5.6

Oregon

OR

5

28.0%

60

17,670

4,949

82.5

Pennsylvania

PA

1

19.3%

201

10,310

1,985

9.9

Rhode Island

RI

1

19.3%

11

370

71

6.5

South Carolina

SC

2

27.2%

1,506

6,750

1,833

1.2

South Dakota

SD

3

9.9%

414

2,140

212

0.5

Tennessee

TN

2

19.3%

2,154

6,990

1,346

0.6

Texas

TX

4

16.6%

1,481

32,260

5,340

3.6

Utah

UT

5

28.0%

1,709

2,160

605

0.4

Virginia

VA

1

19.3%

4,150

9,650

1,858

0.4

Vermont

VT

1

19.3%

391

1,000

193

0.5

Washington

WA

5

28.0%

837

22,610

6,333

7.6

Wisconsin

WI

3

9.9%

77

9,570

948

12.3

West Virginia

WV

1

19.3%

6

2,180

420

69.9

Wyoming

WY

5

28.0%

344

820

230

0.7


2007

State

State Abreviation

Region

% of Undocumented Workers by Region

Documented Guest Workers (H-2A)

Total Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented : H-2A Ratio

Alabama

AL

2

26.3%

167

8,880

2,335

14.0

Arkansas

AR

2

26.3%

471

9,740

2,561

5.4

Arizona

AZ

4

11.4%

335

25,990

2,951

8.8

California

CA

6

31.3%

820

360,860

113,007

137.8

Colorado

CO

5

29.1%

376

6,430

1,873

5.0

Connecticut

CT

1

26.7%

11

2,200

587

53.4

Florida

FL

2

26.3%

4,524

60,690

15,960

3.5

Georgia

GA

2

26.3%

2,198

21,000

5,523

2.5

Iowa

IA

3

13.8%

17

10,040

1,385

81.5

Idaho

ID

5

29.1%

322

7,900

2,301

7.1

Illinois

IL

3

13.8%

28

11,400

1,572

56.2

Indiana

IN

3

13.8%

2

6,590

909

454.5

Kansas

KS

3

13.8%

55

4,380

604

11.0

Kentucky

KY

1

26.7%

114

8,340

2,227

19.5

Louisiana

LA

2

26.3%

1,066

6,370

1,675

1.6

Maryland

MD

1

26.7%

72

5,340

1,426

19.8

Michigan

MI

3

13.8%

4

10,200

1,407

351.7

Minnesota

MN

3

13.8%

84

7,450

1,028

12.2

Missouri

MO

3

13.8%

57

8,210

1,132

19.9

Mississippi

MS

2

26.3%

279

6,670

1,754

6.3

Montana

MT

5

29.1%

72

4,160

1,212

16.8

North Carolina

NC

1

26.7%

934

12,360

3,300

3.5

North Dakota

ND

3

13.8%

43

2,210

305

7.1

Nebraska

NE

3

13.8%

13

7,130

983

75.6

New Jersey

NJ

1

26.7%

15

7,300

1,949

129.9

New Mexico

NM

4

11.4%

4

5,940

675

168.6

Nevada

NV

5

29.1%

173

870

253

1.5

New York

NY

1

26.7%

192

11,130

2,972

15.5

Ohio

OH

3

13.8%

6

8,770

1,210

201.6

Oklahoma

OK

4

11.4%

38

7,980

906

23.8

Oregon

OR

5

29.1%

16

19,060

5,551

346.9

Pennsylvania

PA

1

26.7%

17

11,490

3,068

180.5

South Carolina

SC

2

26.3%

686

6,930

1,822

2.7

South Dakota

SD

3

13.8%

24

2,180

301

12.5

Tennessee

TN

1

26.7%

400

5,670

1,514

3.8

Texas

TX

4

11.4%

218

29,700

3,373

15.5

Utah

UT

5

29.1%

565

2,010

585

1.0

Virginia

VA

1

26.7%

85

9,320

2,488

29.3

Vermont

VT

1

26.7%

32

1,320

352

11.0

Washington

WA

5

29.1%

37

21,280

6,198

167.5

Wisconsin

WI

3

13.8%

1

9,700

1,338

1337.9

Wyoming

WY

5

29.1%

306

710

207

0.7

Delaware

DE

1

26.7%

0

1,210

323

0.0

Massachusetts

MA

1

26.7%

0

3,310

884

0.0

Maine

ME

1

26.7%

0

3,120

833

0.0

New Hampshire

NH

1

26.7%

0

1,230

328

0.0

Rhode Island

RI

1

26.7%

0

430

115

0.0

West Virginia

WV

1

26.7%

0

2,090

558

0.0


2008

State

State Abreviation

Region

% of Undocumented Workers by Region

Documented Guest Workers (H-2A)

Total Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented : H-2A Ratio

Alabama

AL

2

34.9%

567

8,840

3,086

5.4

Arkansas

AR

2

34.9%

3,304

9,520

3,324

1.0

Arizona

AZ

4

14.8%

2,218

25,340

3,747

1.7

California

CA

6

41.0%

3,970

361,570

148,091

37.3

Colorado

CO

5

34.8%

2,601

6,240

2,174

0.8

Connecticut

CT

1

31.2%

708

1,810

565

0.8

Delaware

DE

1

31.2%

91

1,350

421

4.6

Florida

FL

2

34.9%

1,732

59,750

20,859

12.0

Georgia

GA

2

34.9%

5,790

18,020

6,291

1.1

Iowa

IA

3

14.8%

1,871

11,880

1,755

0.9

Idaho

ID

5

34.8%

3,701

7,230

2,519

0.7

Illinois

IL

3

14.8%

797

11,700

1,728

2.2

Indiana

IN

3

14.8%

139

5,870

867

6.2

Kansas

KS

3

14.8%

969

4,540

671

0.7

Kentucky

KY

1

31.2%

5,704

8,380

2,615

0.5

Louisiana

LA

2

34.9%

4,913

5,420

1,892

0.4

Massachusetts

MA

1

31.2%

662

3,630

1,133

1.7

Maryland

MD

1

31.2%

1,058

4,960

1,548

1.5

Maine

ME

1

31.2%

634

3,140

980

1.5

Michigan

MI

3

14.8%

467

6,290

929

2.0

Minnesota

MN

3

14.8%

874

8,670

1,281

1.5

Missouri

MO

3

14.8%

343

8,920

1,318

3.8

Mississippi

MS

2

34.9%

2,222

6,040

2,109

0.9

Montana

MT

5

34.8%

760

3,980

1,386

1.8

North Carolina

NC

1

31.2%

16,949

12,240

3,820

0.2

North Dakota

ND

3

14.8%

774

2,150

318

0.4

Nebraska

NE

3

14.8%

182

7,960

1,176

6.5

New Hampshire

NH

1

31.2%

268

1,120

350

1.3

New Jersey

NJ

1

31.2%

752

6,540

2,041

2.7

New Mexico

NM

4

14.8%

190

4,980

736

3.9

Nevada

NV

5

34.8%

1,725

150

52

0.0

New York

NY

1

31.2%

4,180

10,320

3,221

0.8

Ohio

OH

3

14.8%

1,183

9,130

1,349

1.1

Oklahoma

OK

4

14.8%

304

8,160

1,207

4.0

Oregon

OR

5

34.8%

132

17,850

6,218

47.1

Pennsylvania

PA

1

31.2%

594

12,890

4,023

6.8

Rhode Island

RI

1

31.2%

12

40

12

1.0

South Carolina

SC

2

34.9%

1,303

7,180

2,507

1.9

South Dakota

SD

3

14.8%

487

2,210

326

0.7

Tennessee

TN

1

31.2%

2,487

4,930

1,539

0.6

Texas

TX

4

14.8%

2,826

30,980

4,582

1.6

Utah

UT

5

34.8%

1,565

2,430

846

0.5

Virginia

VA

1

31.2%

4,217

9,910

3,093

0.7

Vermont

VT

1

31.2%

501

1,360

424

0.8

Washington

WA

5

34.8%

2,783

21,090

7,347

2.6

Wisconsin

WI

3

14.8%

284

9,400

1,389

4.9

West Virginia

WV

1

31.2%

37

1,460

456

12.3

Wyoming

WY

5

34.8%

336

640

223

0.7


2009

State

State Abreviation

Region

% of Undocumented Workers by Region

Documented Guest Workers (H-2A)

Total Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented Ag. Workers by State

Undocumented : H-2A Ratio

Alabama

AL

2

30.0%

470

8,950

2,689

5.7

Arkansas

AR

2

30.0%

2,952

8,300

2,494

0.8

Arizona

AZ

4

14.8%

1,320

21,880

3,236

2.5

California

CA

6

41.5%

2,551

347,430

144,146

56.5

Colorado

CO

5

39.8%

2,167

5,860

2,334

1.1

Connecticut

CT

1

31.2%

479

1,420

443

0.9

Delaware

DE

1

31.2%

77

1,260

393

5.1

Florida

FL

2

30.0%

1,669

66,110

19,865

11.9

Georgia

GA

2

30.0%

5,292

13,020

3,912

0.7

Iowa

IA

3

19.6%

1,401

12,660

2,478

1.8

Idaho

ID

5

39.8%

3,634

6,230

2,481

0.7

Illinois

IL

3

19.6%

542

11,660

2,282

4.2

Indiana

IN

3

19.6%

89

5,190

1,016

11.4

Kansas

KS

3

19.6%

776

5,490

1,074

1.4

Kentucky

KY

1

31.2%

5,919

8,220

2,565

0.4

Louisiana

LA

2

30.0%

5,814

5,080

1,526

0.3

Massachusetts

MA

1

31.2%

1,099

2,790

871

0.8

Maryland

MD

1

31.2%

836

4,310

1,345

1.6

Maine

ME

1

31.2%

1,182

2,940

917

0.8

Michigan

MI

3

19.6%

463

8,270

1,619

3.5

Minnesota

MN

3

19.6%

710

8,550

1,673

2.4

Missouri

MO

3

19.6%

286

8,370

1,638

5.7

Mississippi

MS

2

30.0%

2,411

6,430

1,932

0.8

Montana

MT

5

39.8%

684

3,040

1,211

1.8

North Carolina

NC

1

31.2%

16,260

10,920

3,408

0.2

North Dakota

ND

3

19.6%

801

2,380

466

0.6

Nebraska

NE

3

19.6%

209

7,740

1,515

7.2

New Hampshire

NH

1

31.2%

579

1,090

340

0.6

New Jersey

NJ

1

31.2%

515

4,190

1,308

2.5

New Mexico

NM

4

14.8%

189

5,780

855

4.5

Nevada

NV

5

39.8%

1,665

880

350

0.2

New York

NY

1

31.2%

4,408

9,650

3,012

0.7

Ohio

OH

3

19.6%

1,291

8,210

1,607

1.2

Oklahoma

OK

4

14.8%

354

7,680

1,136

3.2

Oregon

OR

5

39.8%

57

17,210

6,854

120.2

Pennsylvania

PA

1

31.2%

701

13,270

4,141

5.9

Rhode Island

RI

1

31.2%

10

0

0

0.0

South Carolina

SC

2

30.0%

1,295

7,640

2,296

1.8

South Dakota

SD

3

19.6%

467

2,160

423

0.9

Tennessee

TN

1

31.2%

2,311

5,210

1,626

0.7

Texas

TX

4

14.8%

2,499

27,800

4,111

1.6

Utah

UT

5

39.8%

1,928

2,020

804

0.4

Virginia

VA

1

31.2%

3,969

8,650

2,699

0.7

Vermont

VT

1

31.2%

498

930

290

0.6

Washington

WA

5

39.8%

2,057

20,770

8,272

4.0

Wisconsin

WI

3

19.6%

327

10,430

2,041

6.2

West Virginia

WV

1

31.2%

48

1,400

437

9.1

Wyoming

WY

5

39.8%

379

720

287

0.8

 

Figures and Maps
2006_AG_IMMIGRATION_MAP
2007_AG_IMMIGRATION_MAP
2008_AG_IMMIGRATION_MAP
2009_AG_IMMIGRATION_MAP
Analysis
Each year more than a million undocumented workers participate in the agriculture industry. In some States, the number of undocumented workers is equal to the number of documented H-2A workers, and in many others undocumented workers far outnumber documented H-2A workers.  

In 2006, Oregon and West Virginia had the highest number of undocumented to documented H-2A workers with a ratio of 95:1.  California, New Mexico, Wisconsin, and Indiana also had a high number of undocumented to documented H-2A workers with a ratio of 36:1.  The remainder of the States had 10:1 or fewer undocumented to documented H-2A workers.  

In 2007, many more States had very high ratios of undocumented to documented H-2A workers; this was the case for all Regions.   California, Washington, Oregon, New Mexico, Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey all had undocumented to documented H-2A ratios of 780:1.  Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Illinois, Maryland, South Dakota, Montana, and Rhode Island had undocumented to documented H-2A workers was 36:1.  It is unclear if fewer permits were applied for, the needs of the industry were much higher than average, respondents from the NAWS survey were more forthcoming in their responses, or if fewer H-2A permits were granted.  This is a huge increase in the proportion of undocumented workers in the agriculture work force from 2006.

In 2008, Oregon and California had undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratio of 95:1.  West Virginia and Florida had undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratios of 36:1. The remainder of the States had undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratios of 10:1 or fewer.  

In 2009, only Oregon had an undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratio of 95:1.  California had an undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratio of 36:1.  The remainder of the States had undocumented to documented H-2A worker ratios of 10:1 or fewer.  

The maps and data tables above give a rough estimate of the scope of the problem of undocumented workers in the U.S agricultural industry.  Obtaining precise data about the number of undocumented workers in the agriculture industry is impossible because there is no way to quantify the exact number of undocumented workers.  NAWS data provides the closest estimate of the number of undocumented agriculture workers available.  These data were extrapolated and applied to each State in the Region of the NAWS study.  The calculation of the estimated number of undocumented workers was then straightforward.  

What is obvious after analyzing the data, is that there are a huge number of undocumented workers in the US agriculture labor force, and the number of work permits granted by the H-2A program falls short of the needs of the agricultural industry necessitating the employment of undocumented workers when documented workers cannot provide sufficient labor.

Conclusions
Based on the number of undocumented workers compared to the number of H-2A guest workers admitted into the agriculture work force each year, it appears that the number of temporary work permits granted falls woefully short of what is needed to meet the demands of the agriculture industry.  One possible place to begin to address the problem of undocumented workers is through reform of the H-2A guest worker program.  By allowing a sufficient number of guest workers into the country, and applying more strict rules about verifying documentation of workers, the problem of undocumented workers can begin to be addressed. More accurate estimates of the actual work force needs of the agricultural industry are necessary to better project the number of guest worker permits that should be granted each year.   Only by having a system that realistically meets the demands of the agriculture industry, can we begin to address the problem of undocumented workers in the agricultural work force.
References
Martin, Philip. "California Hired Farm Labor 1960-2010: Change and Continuity" Farmworkers Forum. Craig C. Smith. 30 Apr. 2011. University of California-Davis. 1 Nov 2011 <http://farmworkersforum.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/california-hired-farm-labor-1960-2010-change-and-continuity/>.

Schmitt L., Andrea. “Ending the Silence: Thai H-2A Workers, Recruitment Fees, and the Fair Labor Standards Act” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Volume 16 No. 1(2011). Retrieved from http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/606/16PacRimLPolyJ167.pdf?sequence=1

Passel S., Jeffrey. “A Portrait of Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States” PEW Hispanic Center. Cohn, D’Vera. 14 Apr 2009. PEW Research Center Publications. 1 Nov 2011 <http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1190/portrait-unauthorized-immigrants-states>

Passel S., Jeffrey, Capps, Randolph, & Fix E., Micheal. “Undocumented Immigrants: Facts and Figures” Health Policy Center Casey E., Annie. 12 Jan 2004. Urban Institute 1 Nov 2011 <http://www.urban.org/health_policy/url.cfm?ID=1000587>

Martin, Philip & Calvin, Linda. “Labor Trajectories in California’s Produce Industry” Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics - University of California-Davis Volume 14 No. 4 (2011) Retrieved from <http://giannini.ucop.edu/media/are-