Posted by Sophary Svay (207.200.116.196) on June 21, 2005 at 7:22:16 a.m.:
In Reply to: Re: Unit 2 "A Jury..." and Trifles Question 1 posted by Francis Ogbah on June 20, 2005 at 6:25:58 p.m.:
I agree with you, about the story having a few more details than the audio. The story can defenetly be more descriptive then the audio. The writer was able to explain and add little more details, that was not in the audio. I also agree with you that the audio was able to establish the same points by cutting out the details. When you read the story, the writer has to put in twice the effort in order to get the reader to get the point of the story. the audio which is quick and understandable.