Results
ArcMap
Creating polygons and attributes easy except when trying to
enter raster field data for JPGs – multiple ArcMap crashes when
trying to save edits – probably machine dependent issue.
Can link image attributes as raster field image will come up
in an ArcMap viewer application while still in map view.
Can link image and/or sound files via hyperlink in a text
field – disadvantage is that the image or audio is then opened and
played by the default image or audio program for that computer –
takes over ArcMap.
Can export shapefiles and attributes to Google Earth via an
Export to KML tool.
Google
Earth
Added point, polygon and image features directly to map.
Uploaded / added KMZ files generated by ArcMap and by RoboGEO
software tools.
Analysis
ArcGIS
ArcGIS - Pros
ArcGIS has true database functions – can store, link, search,
and select features based upon unique attributes.
Raster Field display from embedded viewer is less disruptive
when ‘browsing’ map with ID tool.
Can easily display label/name data by enabling hover type
tool tip for cursor.
ArcGIS – Cons
Need ArcMap (?ArcViewer) to utilize.
Expensive software package needed to create
content.
Raster images need to be stored on user’s computer or
?server.
Need ArcScene for more realistic 3D/DEM views.
No simple web-based access.
Google
Earth
Google Earth Pros
Web-based access
High quality/resolution graphics
Easy to create polygons, points, link photos
3D/DEM type views built-in
Can accept shapefiles generated by ArcMap KML export
tool.
Can distribute KML/Z files to others so that they can ‘see’
the same features.
Inexpensive / free software
Google Earth Cons
Lacks database functionality
Each feature needs to have its attribute information edited
individually both for content and display.
Lacks an easy map-based labeling, search or browse function -
can select information, but need to know a name prior to
search.
|